Bug 117305

This started off as an accessibility bug, but I noticed it would be better to pull the line thickness from the RenderMathMLFraction object. Then I saw that line thickness is not handling integer values like it should

Created attachment 203987 [details] patch

Comment on attachment 203987 [details] patch OK

The correct syntax for MathML length is given here: http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML/chapter2.html#type.length Note that "A number without a unit is intepreted as a multiple of the default value. This form is primarily for backward compatibility and should be avoided, prefering explicit units for clarity." so strictly speaking your code should really do m_lineThickness = thicknessIntValue * gLineMedium; (it turns out that gLineMedium = 1.f so that does not change anything). Anyway, I would have preferred that WebKit does not implement the deprecated unitless syntax for length or at least not before the recommended syntax with explicit unit is implemented. Parsing of MathML lengths is implemented in bug 115610. I'm wondering why this patch took two days to be approved while my review request on bug 115610 has been ignored so far. Does the WebKit project require to ask explicit review on IRC or something in addition to the review flag?

(In reply to comment #5) > The correct syntax for MathML length is given here: > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML/chapter2.html#type.length > > Note that > > "A number without a unit is intepreted as a multiple of the default value. This form is primarily for backward compatibility and should be avoided, prefering explicit units for clarity." > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/chap3_3.html#sec3.3.2 The examples all use unit less values and there is scant talk of deprecating that mode in that section. Anyone looking to set this is going to look at those examples first > so strictly speaking your code should really do > > m_lineThickness = thicknessIntValue * gLineMedium; > Yes it would appear that is correct. Feel free to submit a patch > (it turns out that gLineMedium = 1.f so that does not change anything). > > Anyway, I would have preferred that WebKit does not implement the deprecated unitless syntax for length or at least not before the recommended syntax with explicit unit is implemented. From the same paragraph In general, the value of linethickness can be a number, as a multiplier of the default thickness of the fraction bar (the default thickness is not specified by MathML), or a number with a unit of vertical length (see Section 2.3.3), or one of the keywords medium (same as 1), thin (thinner than 1, otherwise up to the renderer), or thick (thicker than 1, otherwise up to the renderer). -- There's no talk of deprecating unit less values. > > Parsing of MathML lengths is implemented in bug 115610. I'm wondering why this patch took two days to be approved while my review request on bug 115610 has been ignored so far. Does the WebKit project require to ask explicit review on IRC or something in addition to the review flag? Perhaps you have CC'd the wrong reviewers

> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/chap3_3.html#sec3.3.2 > The examples all use unit less values and there is scant talk of deprecating > that mode in that section. Anyone looking to set this is going to look at > those examples first > From the same paragraph > In general, the value of linethickness can be a number, as a multiplier of the default thickness of the fraction bar (the default thickness is not specified by MathML), or a number with a unit of vertical length (see Section 2.3.3), or one of the keywords medium (same as 1), thin (thinner than 1, otherwise up to the renderer), or thick (thicker than 1, otherwise up to the renderer). > -- There's no talk of deprecating unit less values. This is the MathML 1 REC from 1998, the MathML 3 version does not have this paragraph (although it's true they kept the examples from the MathML 1 spec). The sentence I quoted is from the MathML 3 version: "This form is primarily for backward compatibility and should be avoided, prefering explicit units for clarity." > Perhaps you have CC'd the wrong reviewers It seems that Google people used to review the MathML patches last year. I asked elsewhere clarification about who is in charge of reviewing the MathML code after the Blink fork, but didn't get any reply. Thanks for having looked at my patch.

(In reply to comment #7) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-MathML/chap3_3.html#sec3.3.2 > > > The examples all use unit less values and there is scant talk of deprecating > that mode in that section. Anyone looking to set this is going to look at > those examples first > > > From the same paragraph > > > In general, the value of linethickness can be a number, as a multiplier of the default thickness of the fraction bar (the default thickness is not specified by MathML), or a number with a unit of vertical length (see Section 2.3.3), or one of the keywords medium (same as 1), thin (thinner than 1, otherwise up to the renderer), or thick (thicker than 1, otherwise up to the renderer). > > > -- There's no talk of deprecating unit less values. > > This is the MathML 1 REC from 1998, the MathML 3 version does not have this paragraph (although it's true they kept the examples from the MathML 1 spec). The sentence I quoted is from the MathML 3 version: "This form is primarily for backward compatibility and should be avoided, prefering explicit units for clarity." Right you are. Well let's try to get this resolved with your patch > > > Perhaps you have CC'd the wrong reviewers > > It seems that Google people used to review the MathML patches last year. I asked elsewhere clarification about who is in charge of reviewing the MathML code after the Blink fork, but didn't get any reply. Thanks for having looked at my patch. I'm not sure either but I'm willing to look at MathML patches

Mass change: add WebExposed keyword to help MDN documentation.