ssia
Created attachment 465880 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 465880 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=465880&action=review > Source/WebCore/layout/formattingContexts/inline/InlineLevelBox.h:76 > struct LayoutBounds { > - InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return ascent + descent; } > - bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return ascent == other.ascent && descent == other.descent; } > + LayoutBounds(AscentAndDescent); > + LayoutBounds() = default; > > - InlineLayoutUnit ascent { 0 }; > - InlineLayoutUnit descent { 0 }; > + InlineLayoutUnit ascent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.ascent; } > + InlineLayoutUnit descent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.descent; } > + > + InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.height(); } > + bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return m_ascentAndDescent == other.m_ascentAndDescent; } > + > + private: > + AscentAndDescent m_ascentAndDescent; > }; Maybe this type can be just replaced with AscentAndDescent directly? Or `using LayoutBounds = AscentAndDescent`?
(In reply to Antti Koivisto from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 465880 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=465880&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/layout/formattingContexts/inline/InlineLevelBox.h:76 > > struct LayoutBounds { > > - InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return ascent + descent; } > > - bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return ascent == other.ascent && descent == other.descent; } > > + LayoutBounds(AscentAndDescent); > > + LayoutBounds() = default; > > > > - InlineLayoutUnit ascent { 0 }; > > - InlineLayoutUnit descent { 0 }; > > + InlineLayoutUnit ascent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.ascent; } > > + InlineLayoutUnit descent() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.descent; } > > + > > + InlineLayoutUnit height() const { return m_ascentAndDescent.height(); } > > + bool operator==(const LayoutBounds& other) const { return m_ascentAndDescent == other.m_ascentAndDescent; } > > + > > + private: > > + AscentAndDescent m_ascentAndDescent; > > }; > > Maybe this type can be just replaced with AscentAndDescent directly? Or > `using LayoutBounds = AscentAndDescent`? yeah it was going to be one of the next steps, but you are right, there's no need for this intermediate step. will change.
Created attachment 465888 [details] Patch
Created attachment 465895 [details] Patch
Created attachment 465897 [details] Patch
Created attachment 465906 [details] Patch
Committed 262942@main (a055bb114d45): <https://commits.webkit.org/262942@main> All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug and clearing flags on attachment 465906 [details].
<rdar://problem/108030264>